USA

Details of the US decision to provide Ukraine with ATACMS missiles

The administration of US President Joe Biden decided to provide Ukraine with long-range ATACMS missiles before President Volodymyr Zelenskyy visited the US but chose not to announce it publicly.

The Financial Times reported this, quoting its sources. The long-range missiles should help the Ukrainian army fight against the Russian invading troops.

The FT’s source said this was done not to give the Russians a clue or encourage them to move their supply lines further away from the front line. The sources said the US will send missiles soon, initially in small numbers.

They also reiterated the already known information that Washington would send a version of the missiles armed with cluster munitions rather than a single warhead.

Sending the missiles with cluster munitions will help alleviate some of the concerns of US officials that a single-warhead delivery would deplete US stockpiles, the sources said.

Earlier, NBC News reported that Biden told Zelenskyy at a meeting at the White House that Washington would provide a small number of ATACMS missiles to help in the war against Russia.

NBC News cited three unnamed US officials and a congressional representative familiar with the talks who confirmed that US President Joe Biden told his Ukrainian counterpart Volodymyr Zelenskyy that Washington would provide a small number of long-range ATACMS missiles to help in the war against Russia.

Washington has previously explained its refusal to transfer long-range missiles by saying that the United States does not have sufficient stocks of these weapons. Another reason, privately voiced by US officials, is the fear of escalation by Russia.

Mike

Media analyst and journalist. Fully committed to insightful, analytical, investigative journalism and debunking disinformation. My goal is to produce analytical articles on Ukraine, and Europe, based on trustworthy sources.

Recent Posts

How Propaganda and Cash Bonuses Feed Russia’s War Machine Despite High Losses

Russia’s war in Ukraine increasingly runs on a blunt exchange: money up front, myth on…

1 day ago

“You Don’t Need to Pay Influencers in Serbia”: Fact-Checker Ivan Subotić on How Russian Propaganda Thrives for Free

Ivan Subotić is the editor-in-chief at the Serbian portal FakeNews Tracker and collaborates with the…

1 day ago

Two Norwegian Sites, One Kremlin Script: Derimot.no and Steigan.no Under the Microscope

Pro-Russian propaganda in Norway rarely looks like a bot swarm or a shadowy “state channel”.…

5 days ago

Pro-Kremlin outlets weaponize Russia’s Oreshnik strike on Ukraine to intimidate Europe, justify aggression

A coordinated propaganda campaign across Central and Western Europe portrays Russia's Oreshnik missile strike on…

1 week ago

How a Russian Fake Nearly Reignited Ukrainian–Hungarian Tensions, and Why Pro-Orbán Media Took the Bait

In recent years, Viktor Orbán has earned a reputation as the most openly anti-Ukrainian leader…

1 week ago

Russian “Z-Nuns” in Sweden: How Churches Became a Channel for Espionage and War Financing

What began as a seemingly harmless act of charity in Swedish churches has turned into…

1 week ago