Europe

EU General Court upholds ban on legal advice for Russian entities

The European Union General Court has upheld EU sanctions that prohibit giving legal advice to the Russian government and Russian entities, confirming that the ban does not extend to advice relating to judicial or arbitral proceedings.

It was confirmed in the EU Court’s press release. This decision is part of the EU sanctions imposed in response to Russia’s war aggression against Ukraine.

Bar associations from Belgium, France, and the Netherlands filed lawsuits against this ban. However, the EU Court rejected their complaints, stating that the ban does not violate the right to legal defense or affect individuals’ legal representation in judicial, administrative, or arbitration proceedings.

In its judgment, the General Court rejected the lawyers’ arguments on the grounds that the ban did not undermine the right to effective judicial protection. The General Court argues that the prohibition applies only to the provision of legal advice by a lawyer and not to the provision of assistance by a lawyer during legal proceedings.

The EU ban does not apply to legal advice given to natural persons, according to the General Court. The judges also ruled that the ban does not undermine professional secrecy and lawyers’ independence, as the lawyers had argued.

The ban, which is part of the EU’s sanctions, only applies to legal consultations unrelated to court cases and aims to increase pressure on Russia to force it to stop the war.

The General Court notes that the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union recognizes all persons as having a right to effective judicial protection, which includes the right to legal advice and representation in the context of ongoing or anticipated litigation. The judgment states that the prohibition at issue does not call that right into question.

The court separately emphasizes that legal advisory assistance provided to individuals is not subject to the sanction restrictions introduced by the EU Council.

The EU court clarified in that regard “that the general prohibition on providing legal advisory services to the Russian government or to legal persons, entities, or bodies established in Russia does not concern legal advisory services provided in connection with judicial, administrative, or arbitral proceedings. The prohibition thus applies only to legal advice that has no link with judicial proceedings,” the document says.

Since Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, the EU has introduced 14 packages of individual and sectoral economic sanctions against the Russian state, including legal services.

In October 2022, the European Union imposed its eighth package of sanctions, which banned IT consulting, legal consultations, architectural, and engineering services for Russian companies.

With certain exemptions, these restrictive legal measures prohibit any European companies involved in the provision of legal advisory services, including those practicing in the EU territory, from rendering any legal services to the Russian government and to Russia-based legal entities or organizations.

The UK adopted a similar ban on consulting in 2023. London banned individuals and legal entities associated with the Russian government from accessing British legal expertise.

In 2024, the United States prohibited American companies from providing IT consulting, design, support, and cloud services to any legal entities in Russia.

Alex Khomiakov

My passion for journalism began in high school, and I have since devoted my career to reporting on issues that matter to people around the world. I believe that journalism has the power to effect real change in the world, and I am passionate about using my platform to give voice to those who are too often overlooked.

Recent Posts

300,000 Views: AI Chatbot Traffic to Russian Propaganda Websites: Web Analytics Data

AI chatbots have become a visible source of traffic for Russian propaganda websites under EU…

4 days ago

How Propaganda and Cash Bonuses Feed Russia’s War Machine Despite High Losses

Russia’s war in Ukraine increasingly runs on a blunt exchange: money up front, myth on…

1 week ago

“You Don’t Need to Pay Influencers in Serbia”: Fact-Checker Ivan Subotić on How Russian Propaganda Thrives for Free

Ivan Subotić is the editor-in-chief at the Serbian portal FakeNews Tracker and collaborates with the…

1 week ago

Two Norwegian Sites, One Kremlin Script: Derimot.no and Steigan.no Under the Microscope

Pro-Russian propaganda in Norway rarely looks like a bot swarm or a shadowy “state channel”.…

2 weeks ago

Pro-Kremlin outlets weaponize Russia’s Oreshnik strike on Ukraine to intimidate Europe, justify aggression

A coordinated propaganda campaign across Central and Western Europe portrays Russia's Oreshnik missile strike on…

2 weeks ago

How a Russian Fake Nearly Reignited Ukrainian–Hungarian Tensions, and Why Pro-Orbán Media Took the Bait

In recent years, Viktor Orbán has earned a reputation as the most openly anti-Ukrainian leader…

2 weeks ago