Technology

EU leaders reached agreement on a crucial AI law after 36 hours of talks

Members of the European Parliament, representatives of member states, and experts from the European Commission have reached a political agreement on a law on artificial intelligence (AI), which is the EU’s first attempt to regulate the new technology.

After more than 36 hours of negotiations lasting three days, representatives of the three EU institutions managed to reach an agreement on such controversial issues as predictive applications, face recognition, and the use of artificial intelligence by law enforcement agencies, Politico reported.

Experts anticipate that further technical revisions will be necessary to enhance the political agreement that has been achieved.

“The EU becomes the very first continent to set clear rules for the use of AI,” Internal Market Commissioner Thierry Breton posted on his account on X. “The [AI Act] is much more than a rulebook — it’s a launchpad for EU startups and researchers to lead the global AI race.”

“The AI law is much more than a set of rules; it is a launching pad for startups and researchers from the EU to lead the global AI race,” the EU commissioner added.

Lawmaker Dragoș Tudorache, one of the AI Act’s co-rapporteurs in the European Parliament, wrote, “We are the first in the world to set in place real regulation for [AI], and for the future digital world driven by AI, guiding the development and evolution of this technology in a human-centric direction.”

According to AFP, the launch of ChatGPT, a text generator from California-based OpenAI that can write essays, poems, or translations in seconds, had a decisive impact on the start of the negotiation process.

This system, as well as systems capable of creating sounds or images, has opened up the world to the enormous potential of artificial intelligence but also to certain risks. For example, the spread of fake photos on social media has shown the danger of manipulating public opinion.

Systems considered “high-risk” and used mainly in sensitive areas such as critical infrastructure, education, human resources, law enforcement, etc., are subject to a list of rules in the EU project. These systems will be subject to a number of obligations, such as ensuring human control over the machine, drafting technical documentation, or implementing a risk management system.

The legislation provides for the introduction of special supervision over artificial intelligence systems that interact with humans. It will force them to inform the user that they are interacting with a machine.

The document also provides for the rare use of prohibitions, which will apply mainly to those applications that contradict European values. An example that should not be imitated is China, which has systems for assessing citizens, conducting mass surveillance, and implementing remote biometric identification of people in public places.

However, EU countries have been granted freedom to engage in certain types of law enforcement activities, such as combating terrorism.

Additionally, the agreement stipulates that the European Commission will establish a European Office for Artificial Intelligence, and European legislation will be equipped with surveillance measures and sanctions. For the most serious offenses, the agreement will impose fines of up to 7 percent of turnover, with a lower limit of 35 million euros.

Germany, France, and Italy have reached an agreement on how to regulate artificial intelligence in the future.

Before that, the National Cyber Security Centre of the UK stated that artificial intelligence poses a threat to the next parliamentary elections in the country, and cyberattacks by hostile countries and their proxies are becoming increasingly difficult to track.

Signing the first international declaration dedicated to this fast-growing technology, the UK, the US, the EU, Australia, and China have all agreed that artificial intelligence poses a potentially catastrophic threat to humanity.

Mike

Media analyst and journalist. Fully committed to insightful, analytical, investigative journalism and debunking disinformation. My goal is to produce analytical articles on Ukraine, and Europe, based on trustworthy sources.

Recent Posts

How Pro-Russian Media Exploit the US Strike on Venezuela to Reframe Russia’s War in Ukraine

Russian state media and pro-Russian outlets across Europe are coordinating a sophisticated propaganda campaign exploiting…

2 weeks ago

AI-Powered Information Attack on Poland and the EU via TikTok using “AI Girls”

An AI-powered information attack on Poland is no longer a warning buried in expert reports;…

2 weeks ago

Reopening Mariupol Theatre: Russia’s Dancing on Bones as a Propaganda Strategy

Russia staged a dance on bones in a Mariupol theatre for propaganda and concealment of…

2 weeks ago

Putin’s ‘election guarantee’ becomes weapon: how Pro-Russian media in Europe amplify Kremlin’s war narrative

By portraying Vladimir Putin as the only actor able to “ensure security” and “restore legitimacy”…

3 weeks ago

Lithuania Fights for Freedom of Speech: Society Defends Public Broadcaster LRT

Freedom of speech in Lithuania has become the centre of an unprecedented civic mobilisation, as…

4 weeks ago

Where Did Nearly One Million Russian Soldiers Go? A Chilling Manpower Puzzle

The question sounds almost abstract at first, like a numbers game. But it is not.…

4 weeks ago