Europe

EU unblocks €10 billion for Hungary ahead of summit

The threat by Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban to block financial and political support for Ukraine during the EU meeting prompted the European Commission to unfreeze 10 billion euros of EU funds for Hungary, which had been blocked due to rule of law issues.

The Commission has assessed Hungary’s measures and confirmed that it has fulfilled the horizontal condition of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, specifically regarding the independence of the judiciary. As a result, Hungary can now claim around €10.2 billion in payments, as the blocking of Cohesion Policy funding has been lifted.

If the conditions are no longer met, the European Commission may choose to once again cease funding Hungary’s initiatives.

Now, Hungary has the ability to apply for EU funding for projects and receive reimbursement based on the distribution of EU funds.

According to the statement, the Commission made this decision after the Orban government implemented laws to strengthen the independence of the court.

If Hungary’s funds are not fully freed, Orban vowed to veto EU plans to provide 50 billion euros to Ukraine over the next four years, as well as a resolution to begin negotiations on Ukraine’s EU membership.

It is unclear whether the decision to unfreeze 10 billion euros will persuade Orban to abandon his veto plans for Ukraine. A top Hungarian official stated the day before that his country desires a favorable outcome on the release of more than 30 billion euros.

Nonetheless, officials and diplomats hope that by Friday they will be able to reach an agreement on at least a package of financial assistance for Kyiv.

During their conversation, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy requested Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán to present at least one reason for not admitting Ukraine to the EU.

Later, Volodymyr Zelenskyy cautioned that “if Hungary blocks the EU’s decision, it will mean that Putin has vetoed it,” implying Orban’s dependence on Putin in foreign policy.

Mike

Media analyst and journalist. Fully committed to insightful, analytical, investigative journalism and debunking disinformation. My goal is to produce analytical articles on Ukraine, and Europe, based on trustworthy sources.

Recent Posts

Russia Cognitive Warfare in 2026: How Disinformation Became an Architecture of Influence

Recent reporting and analysis on Russian influence operations targeting the EU and Ukraine suggest a…

1 week ago

Russia’s FSB Accused of Using Fake Volyn Tragedy Documents to Strain Ukraine-Poland Relations

Ukraine’s Center for Countering Disinformation says Russia is using fabricated archival material and state media…

1 week ago

Re:Baltica: Kremlin-linked disinformation campaign escalated threats against the Baltics over drone claims

A Re:Baltica investigation says pro-Kremlin media and social media channels used unrelated security incidents in…

2 weeks ago

MV-lehti: How Finland’s Largest Pro-Kremlin Outlet Spreads Russian War Narratives

With nearly 900,000 monthly visitors, MV-lehti is the most-visited pro-Kremlin outlet in Finland — and…

3 weeks ago

Alexandra Jost Sanctions: How the EU Case Shows the Rise of Influencer-Led Kremlin Messaging

The EU’s designation of Alexandra Jost marks a wider shift in how European authorities are…

3 weeks ago

Geoestrategia.eu: How a Spanish Outlet Bypassed EU Sanctions to Keep Amplifying Russian Propaganda

A Spanish-language website with declared partnerships with RT and Sputnik has published more than 2,300…

3 weeks ago