Hearings begin this week in France on an appeal that could reshape the country’s 2027 presidential race. At stake is whether far-right leader Marine Le Pen can legally run for the presidency after being barred from public office following a conviction over misuse of European Union funds.
The case, reported by Reuters, has become one of the most consequential legal battles in recent French politics.
A Verdict That Changed the Race
Le Pen, the longstanding face of the far-right National Rally, was widely considered the likely favourite for the 2027 election until last year. That calculation shifted abruptly when she was found guilty of embezzling more than €4 million in European Parliament funds and handed a five-year ban from running for public office.
The ruling did not end her ambitions, but it put them on hold. Le Pen immediately filed an appeal, as did the National Rally itself and ten other individuals convicted in the same case over the misuse of EU parliamentary funds.
A Tight Legal Calendar
The appeal hearings open on Tuesday and are scheduled to conclude on February 12. Judges are expected to deliver their decision by the summer.
That timing matters. If the judges rule in favour of Le Pen, lifting or significantly reducing the ban, it would reopen the possibility of her running for office in 2027 and enable her to start organising her campaign seriously.
A negative outcome would force the far right to execute a succession plan under intense public scrutiny.
For now, Le Pen’s prospects remain alive but conditional.
Bardella Waiting in the Wings
Should Le Pen ultimately face disqualification from running, she has already designated Jordan Bardella, the 30-year-old president of the National Rally, as her preferred alternative.
Bardella signalled continuity rather than rupture in December, announcing his readiness to run a joint presidential campaign with Le Pen. The message to voters was clear. Even if Le Pen herself cannot appear on the ballot, her political line and influence would remain central.
This arrangement, however, raises its questions. Bardella is popular among younger voters and party loyalists, but he lacks Le Pen’s decades of national exposure and electoral experience.
A Test for French Democracy
The appeal is not just about one politician’s eligibility. It sits at the intersection of law, accountability, and political legitimacy. Supporters contend that an establishment, fearful of her rise, is targeting Le Pen.
Critics counter that the case is about financial misconduct, not ideology, and that no politician should be above the rules governing public funds.
French courts have maintained the strict legality of the proceedings. However, a polarised climate easily blurs the line between judicial decision and political consequence.
A Summer Decision With Long Shadows
If the ban is overturned, Le Pen would re-enter the race with momentum and a narrative of vindication. If it is upheld, the far right will pivot to Bardella while framing the ruling as proof of systemic bias.
Either way, the appeal’s outcome will shape alliances, messaging, and strategy across the French political spectrum well before voters head to the polls.
For now, Le Pen is betting that the courts will give her one more chance. The summer ruling will determine whether that bet pays off.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why was Marine Le Pen banned from running for office?
She was convicted of embezzling EU funds and barred from public office for five years.
When will the appeal decision be known?
A ruling is expected by the summer after hearings conclude in February.
Can Le Pen still run in 2027?
Yes, if the ban is lifted or significantly reduced on appeal.
Who would replace her if she cannot run?
Jordan Bardella, president of the National Rally, is her designated successor.
Why is this case politically important?
It could determine who leads the far right into France’s 2027 presidential election.
