Europe

Georgian Stratcom: Criticism of the government is more threatening than Russian disinformation

The Georgian government’s strategic communications departments mostly target government critics and hardly address Russian disinformation, according to a new study by the International Society for Fair Elections and Democracy (ISFED), a watchdog group in Georgia.

The Coalition for Information Integrity, a coalition of civil society organizations devoted to thwarting Russian information warfare and deception, conducted a research.

Source: Global Strategy

ISFED chair Nino Dolidze cited a recent report by Meta, the parent company of Facebook, in her remarks at a conference on hybrid threats and disinformation in Tbilisi yesterday. This report specifically linked the StratCom division of the Georgian government to a network disseminating false information and attempting to sway public opinion in Georgia. The operation, which was established with assistance from the EU and the US to purportedly counter Russian disinformation, was consequently linked to 80 accounts, 26 Pages, and 9 Groups that Meta removed.

Facebook had removed the governing party-affiliated sites and profiles for engaging in “coordinated inauthentic behaviour,” but this was the first time a government agency tasked with fighting misinformation had been directly implicated in disinformation itself.

The results of Meta’s research have not in any way been disputed by the Georgian government.

The ISFED report noted the usually inactive participation of the ministries and stated that as of 30 April 2023, the Ministry of Defense spent around 60% of its published postings on what it deemed to be “disinformation” that was spread in Georgian critical media.

“Posts published on Stratcom’s pages do not contain information on how Georgia should directly confront these threats,” the ISFED claimed.

Additionally, Ms Dolidze claimed that the StratComs speak in an overly antagonistic manner while addressing the press. Certain posts claimed that Georgian media outlets were “enemies of the state and the church,” among other things.

Photo: Firn and Joel Carillet/iStock/Getty

Past team authors

Recent Posts

300,000 Views: AI Chatbot Traffic to Russian Propaganda Websites: Web Analytics Data

AI chatbots have become a visible source of traffic for Russian propaganda websites under EU…

3 days ago

How Propaganda and Cash Bonuses Feed Russia’s War Machine Despite High Losses

Russia’s war in Ukraine increasingly runs on a blunt exchange: money up front, myth on…

1 week ago

“You Don’t Need to Pay Influencers in Serbia”: Fact-Checker Ivan Subotić on How Russian Propaganda Thrives for Free

Ivan Subotić is the editor-in-chief at the Serbian portal FakeNews Tracker and collaborates with the…

1 week ago

Two Norwegian Sites, One Kremlin Script: Derimot.no and Steigan.no Under the Microscope

Pro-Russian propaganda in Norway rarely looks like a bot swarm or a shadowy “state channel”.…

2 weeks ago

Pro-Kremlin outlets weaponize Russia’s Oreshnik strike on Ukraine to intimidate Europe, justify aggression

A coordinated propaganda campaign across Central and Western Europe portrays Russia's Oreshnik missile strike on…

2 weeks ago

How a Russian Fake Nearly Reignited Ukrainian–Hungarian Tensions, and Why Pro-Orbán Media Took the Bait

In recent years, Viktor Orbán has earned a reputation as the most openly anti-Ukrainian leader…

2 weeks ago