Germany

German Foreign Ministry concerned about large-scale Russian disinformation on X

Experts at the German Foreign Ministry have identified systematic disinformation campaigns in favor of Russia on Twitter (X), and the government is concerned about a possible interference in the elections in the future.

Spiegel reported this, citing a non-public report by analysts from the Department of Strategic Communications of the German Foreign Ministry, who used special software to study a huge amount of data on Twitter between December 20 and January 20.

During that month, the analysts found more than 50,000 accounts that clearly did not belong to real people and were involved in coordinated information campaigns in German. On some days, these bots posted about 200,000 tweets per day. It is noticeable that their activity decreases on weekends and days that are public holidays in Russia.

Among these posts, the narrative that Germany is neglecting the interests of its population in order to support Ukraine is very common: first-person bots write that they “think it’s strange that the government does more for other countries than its citizens.”

At the same time, it seems that the coordinators of this campaign are “hitting the target” of the discontent that some Germans have and trying to inflate it. Experts believe that the goal of the campaign is to incite discontent among Germans and undermine confidence in the government, the democratic system, and the media.

The Kremlin-style influence campaign aimed at attacking German assistance to Ukraine and spreading the narrative of “Ukraine’s defeat” and “the invasion of Ukrainian refugees.”

Analysts at the Foreign Ministry believe that Russia is behind the campaign and that it has been going on since 2022, when Putin started the all-out war against Ukraine.

There is growing concern in the ministry that such massive work on the platform through bots could have a real impact on the upcoming elections, both to the European Parliament and to the three federal states.

Analysts express particular concern that a significant portion of the campaign seems to rely on full automation—bots from a large group of accounts posting tweets simultaneously and at a consistent pace, creating the perception of algorithmic control.

In addition, the campaign coordinators have repeatedly created a fake source in order to use bots to spread the necessary tweets to a large audience.

In September, campaign coordinators shared a screenshot of a trend allegedly from Annalena Baerbock’s real page, claiming that “the war in Ukraine will end in three months.” The use of a template from the Russian-language interface exposed the fakers, revealing that the trend had been photoshopped.

Bots distribute non-existent news and articles on a large scale by faking messages in reputable media. Fraudsters create fake websites that accurately mimic the interface of reputable media outlets and even use the names of journalists to spread false news. The only thing that gives them away is their domain address, and bots spread a shortened link so that vigilant people don’t see it right away.

Despite the eventual banning of some accounts, many of them continue to operate successfully.

The findings were shared with the specialized European center “EU vs. Disinfo.”.

The EU’s top diplomat recently said that the 2024 elections are a major target for disinformation and foreign interference.

The United States also believes that Russia will conduct information operations to turn public opinion against Ukraine before the elections to the European Parliament in June in various European countries.

Mike

Media analyst and journalist. Fully committed to insightful, analytical, investigative journalism and debunking disinformation. My goal is to produce analytical articles on Ukraine, and Europe, based on trustworthy sources.

Recent Posts

How Propaganda and Cash Bonuses Feed Russia’s War Machine Despite High Losses

Russia’s war in Ukraine increasingly runs on a blunt exchange: money up front, myth on…

2 days ago

“You Don’t Need to Pay Influencers in Serbia”: Fact-Checker Ivan Subotić on How Russian Propaganda Thrives for Free

Ivan Subotić is the editor-in-chief at the Serbian portal FakeNews Tracker and collaborates with the…

2 days ago

Two Norwegian Sites, One Kremlin Script: Derimot.no and Steigan.no Under the Microscope

Pro-Russian propaganda in Norway rarely looks like a bot swarm or a shadowy “state channel”.…

6 days ago

Pro-Kremlin outlets weaponize Russia’s Oreshnik strike on Ukraine to intimidate Europe, justify aggression

A coordinated propaganda campaign across Central and Western Europe portrays Russia's Oreshnik missile strike on…

1 week ago

How a Russian Fake Nearly Reignited Ukrainian–Hungarian Tensions, and Why Pro-Orbán Media Took the Bait

In recent years, Viktor Orbán has earned a reputation as the most openly anti-Ukrainian leader…

1 week ago

Russian “Z-Nuns” in Sweden: How Churches Became a Channel for Espionage and War Financing

What began as a seemingly harmless act of charity in Swedish churches has turned into…

1 week ago