Technology

Germany, France, and Italy sign agreement on future AI regulation

France, Germany, and Italy have reached an agreement on how artificial intelligence should be regulated under a joint document that is expected to speed up negotiations at the European level.

Reuters reports that the three countries’ governments favor “mandatory self-regulation through codes of conduct” for the so-called basic AI models designed to produce a wide range of results. But they oppose “untested regulations.”

“Together, we emphasize that the AI Law regulates the use of AI, not the technology itself,” the joint document says. – “The inherent risks are associated with using AI systems, not the technology itself.

The European Commission, the European Parliament, and the Council of the EU are negotiating how the bloc should position itself on this topic.

The document states that developers of fundamental models will have to define model cards used to provide information about a machine learning model.

“The model cards should contain relevant information to understand the model’s functioning, capabilities, and limitations, and should be based on best practices of the development community,” the document says.

In particular, it is noted that no sanctions should be imposed at the initial stage. However, if violations of the code of conduct are detected after a specific time, a sanctions system may be established.

The German Ministry of Economics, which is responsible for this topic together with the Ministry of Digital Technology, stated that laws and state control should not regulate AI itself, but its application.

“We need to regulate applications, not technology, if we want to play in the major league of AI worldwide,” said German Minister of Digital Affairs Volker Wissing.

The German government is having a digital summit in Jena, Thuringia, which will bring together representatives of politics, business, and science.

AI-related issues will also be on the agenda of talks between the German and Italian governments in Berlin this week.

Mike

Media analyst and journalist. Fully committed to insightful, analytical, investigative journalism and debunking disinformation. My goal is to produce analytical articles on Ukraine, and Europe, based on trustworthy sources.

Recent Posts

How Propaganda and Cash Bonuses Feed Russia’s War Machine Despite High Losses

Russia’s war in Ukraine increasingly runs on a blunt exchange: money up front, myth on…

4 days ago

“You Don’t Need to Pay Influencers in Serbia”: Fact-Checker Ivan Subotić on How Russian Propaganda Thrives for Free

Ivan Subotić is the editor-in-chief at the Serbian portal FakeNews Tracker and collaborates with the…

4 days ago

Two Norwegian Sites, One Kremlin Script: Derimot.no and Steigan.no Under the Microscope

Pro-Russian propaganda in Norway rarely looks like a bot swarm or a shadowy “state channel”.…

1 week ago

Pro-Kremlin outlets weaponize Russia’s Oreshnik strike on Ukraine to intimidate Europe, justify aggression

A coordinated propaganda campaign across Central and Western Europe portrays Russia's Oreshnik missile strike on…

1 week ago

How a Russian Fake Nearly Reignited Ukrainian–Hungarian Tensions, and Why Pro-Orbán Media Took the Bait

In recent years, Viktor Orbán has earned a reputation as the most openly anti-Ukrainian leader…

1 week ago

Russian “Z-Nuns” in Sweden: How Churches Became a Channel for Espionage and War Financing

What began as a seemingly harmless act of charity in Swedish churches has turned into…

2 weeks ago