USA

Group of Republicans in Congress called on Biden to lift “far-reaching” restrictions on Ukraine

A group of Republicans from the US House of Representatives called on the White House to lift restrictions on the use of weapons transferred to Ukraine to strike Russian territory. This statement was published on the Congress Committee on Foreign Affairs website.

The signatures on the letter included Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Michael McCaul, Armed Services Committee Chairman Mike Rogers, Standing Intelligence Committee Chairman Mike Turner, Foreign Affairs Committee European Affairs Chairman Tom Kean, Defense Appropriations Chairman Ken Calvert, and Helsinki Commission Commissioner Richard Hudson.

They call on the White House to lift restrictions on Ukraine’s use of American long-range weapons, including ATACS missiles, deep into Russian territory.

“The Biden-Harris administration’s senseless restrictions, combined with the longstanding slow-rolling of critical weapons approvals and deliveries, are hindering Ukraine’s ability to bring this war to a victorious conclusion. It is far past time the administration reverses course and lifts the remaining restrictions on Ukraine’s use of U.S.-provided weapons against legitimate military targets in Russia,” the members of Congress said.

They emphasized that with the status quo, the Russians have a “protected zone” where they can safely keep their weapons and launch strikes on Ukraine’s territory from there.

Against the backdrop of the Russian summer offensive in the Kharkiv region, the signatories welcomed the administration’s decision to allow American weapons to strike near the border. However, they emphasized that this decision came too late. Had Ukraine received this opportunity earlier, the Kharkiv offensive might not have occurred at all, allowing Kyiv to keep larger forces in the most difficult areas in the east, they claimed.

The Republicans noted that more than 200 potential targets still remain within ATACMS range, according to the Institute for the Study of War.

Members of Congress also emphasized that “fears of escalation” turned out to be meaningless, which was confirmed in particular by Ukraine’s operation in the Kursk region of the Russian Federation.

“Recent reports that the real reason for the administration’s reluctance to lift restrictions is not to jeopardize a future reset of relations with Russia are very alarming,” the letter said.

“The Biden-Harris administration’s senseless restrictions, combined with the longstanding slow-rolling of critical weapons approvals and deliveries, are hindering Ukraine’s ability to bring this war to a victorious conclusion. It is far past time the administration reverses course and lifts the remaining restrictions on Ukraine’s use of U.S.-provided weapons against legitimate military targets in Russia,” the letter reads.

The failure of the Obama-Putin “reset” before the Russian invasion of Georgia in 2008 showed that Putin does not respond to appeasement and olive branches. This conflict will end only when tougher sanctions and Ukraine’s successes on the battlefield convince Putin that he won’t gain anything from the war,” they emphasized.

The signatories also expressed disappointment at reports in the media that the United States is dissuading Britain and France from a decision to lift “long-range” restrictions on the weapons they transferred.

“Just as there was a disgraceful delay by the Biden-Harris administration in allowing our allies to provide F-16 fighter jets to Ukraine, the administration is now preventing our more determined allies from helping Ukraine win. Russia should have no safe place from which it can commit war crimes against Ukraine with impunity,” they said.

On September 10, US President Joe Biden hinted that the US might lift restrictions on Ukraine’s use of long-range weapons on Russian territory.

According to reports, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Biden will discuss this issue during their meeting at the White House this Friday.

Ihor Petrenko

I'm a passionate journalist based in Ukraine, specialising in covering local news and events from Ukraine for the Western audience. Also, I work as a fixer for foreign media. Whether I write an article, report from the conflict zone or conduct interviews with political leaders and experts, I'm focused on delivering informative, engaging, and thought-generating content.

Recent Posts

300,000 Views: AI Chatbot Traffic to Russian Propaganda Websites: Web Analytics Data

AI chatbots have become a visible source of traffic for Russian propaganda websites under EU…

5 days ago

How Propaganda and Cash Bonuses Feed Russia’s War Machine Despite High Losses

Russia’s war in Ukraine increasingly runs on a blunt exchange: money up front, myth on…

1 week ago

“You Don’t Need to Pay Influencers in Serbia”: Fact-Checker Ivan Subotić on How Russian Propaganda Thrives for Free

Ivan Subotić is the editor-in-chief at the Serbian portal FakeNews Tracker and collaborates with the…

1 week ago

Two Norwegian Sites, One Kremlin Script: Derimot.no and Steigan.no Under the Microscope

Pro-Russian propaganda in Norway rarely looks like a bot swarm or a shadowy “state channel”.…

2 weeks ago

Pro-Kremlin outlets weaponize Russia’s Oreshnik strike on Ukraine to intimidate Europe, justify aggression

A coordinated propaganda campaign across Central and Western Europe portrays Russia's Oreshnik missile strike on…

2 weeks ago

How a Russian Fake Nearly Reignited Ukrainian–Hungarian Tensions, and Why Pro-Orbán Media Took the Bait

In recent years, Viktor Orbán has earned a reputation as the most openly anti-Ukrainian leader…

2 weeks ago