Europe

Merz Proposes €140 Billion Loan to Ukraine Using Frozen Russian Assets

German Chancellor Friedrich Merz has called on the European Union to unlock frozen Russian assets to provide Ukraine with a €140 billion interest-free loan aimed at ensuring the country’s long-term military resilience.

In an article for the Financial Times, Merz outlined a plan that he described as a decisive signal of Europe’s strength in the face of Moscow’s war of aggression.

A Shift in Germany’s Position

The proposal is a major shift from Berlin’s earlier skepticism about tapping frozen Russian reserves. Merz argued that the loan would not violate property rights, since repayment would only occur after Russia pays reparations to Ukraine.

By tying the funds directly to future compensation, the mechanism would transform Russia’s own assets into a resource for Ukraine’s defense.

The chancellor emphasized that Ukraine must exclusively use the money for military procurement, not for covering its general budget. He added that Kyiv and EU governments should jointly make procurement decisions to strengthen both Ukraine’s defense and Europe’s security.

Financing Mechanism and Legal Framework

Merz stated that EU member states would initially guarantee the loan, and the next long-term EU budget cycle (2028 onward) would later back it. Such an arrangement, he argued, would distribute the risk while creating a legally defensible structure to bypass accusations of unlawful expropriation.

The frozen Russian assets—mostly European, American, and British government bonds held by the Euroclear depository in Belgium—amount to nearly €200 billion. Until now, Brussels has limited itself to using only the annual windfall profits generated by these holdings. Merz’s proposal, however, would tap directly into the underlying capital, unlocking resources on a much larger scale.

Strategic Impact

Merz emphasized that the initiative would both stabilize Ukraine militarily for years and provide a boost to the European defense industry, advancing EU sovereignty and the collective security of the Union. He emphasized that Europe needed to apply effective leverage to disrupt the Russian president’s cynical game of waiting.

Brussels has been considering legal options for months, and Merz’s proposal is likely to intensify the EU’s debate. Any decision will require at least majority approval among member states, though opposition from Hungary and Slovakia, whose leaders are known for Kremlin-friendly stances, could complicate the process.

IN Editorial Team

General reporting on current events by our editorial team members.

Recent Posts

How Propaganda and Cash Bonuses Feed Russia’s War Machine Despite High Losses

Russia’s war in Ukraine increasingly runs on a blunt exchange: money up front, myth on…

13 hours ago

“You Don’t Need to Pay Influencers in Serbia”: Fact-Checker Ivan Subotić on How Russian Propaganda Thrives for Free

Ivan Subotić is the editor-in-chief at the Serbian portal FakeNews Tracker and collaborates with the…

18 hours ago

Two Norwegian Sites, One Kremlin Script: Derimot.no and Steigan.no Under the Microscope

Pro-Russian propaganda in Norway rarely looks like a bot swarm or a shadowy “state channel”.…

5 days ago

Pro-Kremlin outlets weaponize Russia’s Oreshnik strike on Ukraine to intimidate Europe, justify aggression

A coordinated propaganda campaign across Central and Western Europe portrays Russia's Oreshnik missile strike on…

7 days ago

How a Russian Fake Nearly Reignited Ukrainian–Hungarian Tensions, and Why Pro-Orbán Media Took the Bait

In recent years, Viktor Orbán has earned a reputation as the most openly anti-Ukrainian leader…

7 days ago

Russian “Z-Nuns” in Sweden: How Churches Became a Channel for Espionage and War Financing

What began as a seemingly harmless act of charity in Swedish churches has turned into…

1 week ago