Europe

Merz Proposes €140 Billion Loan to Ukraine Using Frozen Russian Assets

German Chancellor Friedrich Merz has called on the European Union to unlock frozen Russian assets to provide Ukraine with a €140 billion interest-free loan aimed at ensuring the country’s long-term military resilience.

In an article for the Financial Times, Merz outlined a plan that he described as a decisive signal of Europe’s strength in the face of Moscow’s war of aggression.

A Shift in Germany’s Position

The proposal is a major shift from Berlin’s earlier skepticism about tapping frozen Russian reserves. Merz argued that the loan would not violate property rights, since repayment would only occur after Russia pays reparations to Ukraine.

By tying the funds directly to future compensation, the mechanism would transform Russia’s own assets into a resource for Ukraine’s defense.

The chancellor emphasized that Ukraine must exclusively use the money for military procurement, not for covering its general budget. He added that Kyiv and EU governments should jointly make procurement decisions to strengthen both Ukraine’s defense and Europe’s security.

Financing Mechanism and Legal Framework

Merz stated that EU member states would initially guarantee the loan, and the next long-term EU budget cycle (2028 onward) would later back it. Such an arrangement, he argued, would distribute the risk while creating a legally defensible structure to bypass accusations of unlawful expropriation.

The frozen Russian assets—mostly European, American, and British government bonds held by the Euroclear depository in Belgium—amount to nearly €200 billion. Until now, Brussels has limited itself to using only the annual windfall profits generated by these holdings. Merz’s proposal, however, would tap directly into the underlying capital, unlocking resources on a much larger scale.

Strategic Impact

Merz emphasized that the initiative would both stabilize Ukraine militarily for years and provide a boost to the European defense industry, advancing EU sovereignty and the collective security of the Union. He emphasized that Europe needed to apply effective leverage to disrupt the Russian president’s cynical game of waiting.

Brussels has been considering legal options for months, and Merz’s proposal is likely to intensify the EU’s debate. Any decision will require at least majority approval among member states, though opposition from Hungary and Slovakia, whose leaders are known for Kremlin-friendly stances, could complicate the process.

IN Editorial Team

General reporting on current events by our editorial team members.

Recent Posts

Russia Cognitive Warfare in 2026: How Disinformation Became an Architecture of Influence

Recent reporting and analysis on Russian influence operations targeting the EU and Ukraine suggest a…

5 days ago

Russia’s FSB Accused of Using Fake Volyn Tragedy Documents to Strain Ukraine-Poland Relations

Ukraine’s Center for Countering Disinformation says Russia is using fabricated archival material and state media…

6 days ago

Re:Baltica: Kremlin-linked disinformation campaign escalated threats against the Baltics over drone claims

A Re:Baltica investigation says pro-Kremlin media and social media channels used unrelated security incidents in…

1 week ago

MV-lehti: How Finland’s Largest Pro-Kremlin Outlet Spreads Russian War Narratives

With nearly 900,000 monthly visitors, MV-lehti is the most-visited pro-Kremlin outlet in Finland — and…

3 weeks ago

Alexandra Jost Sanctions: How the EU Case Shows the Rise of Influencer-Led Kremlin Messaging

The EU’s designation of Alexandra Jost marks a wider shift in how European authorities are…

3 weeks ago

Geoestrategia.eu: How a Spanish Outlet Bypassed EU Sanctions to Keep Amplifying Russian Propaganda

A Spanish-language website with declared partnerships with RT and Sputnik has published more than 2,300…

3 weeks ago