Technology

The law on artificial intelligence came into force in the EU

The press service of the European Commission reported that the European Union has enacted a law on artificial intelligence, dubbed the first such regulatory document in the world.

The European Artificial Intelligence Act should guarantee the security and observance of citizens’ fundamental rights while developing artificial intelligence technologies.

The law mandates, among other things, that users must receive a clear warning before interacting with chatbots rather than live people and that artificial intelligence-generated content must have a label.

Risky AI systems will be subject to additional rules and require human oversight of their “decisions.” This includes the use of technology in recruitment, loan assessment, and so on.

AI systems identified as high-risk will be required to comply with strict requirements, including risk-mitigation systems, high quality of data sets, logging of activity, detailed documentation, clear user information, human oversight, and a high level of robustness, accuracy, and cybersecurity. Regulatory sandboxes will facilitate responsible innovation and the development of compliant AI systems. Such high-risk AI systems include for example AI systems used for recruitment, or to assess whether somebody is entitled to get a loan, or to run autonomous robots.

The European Commission

Government agencies or companies prescribe a ban on AI systems that threaten fundamental rights, including those that can manipulate behavior and enable the creation of a “social rating.”.

Certain types of use, such as emotion recognition systems in the workplace or systems that categorize individuals or provide real-time biometric identification for law enforcement purposes, may be prohibited, subject to certain exceptions.

Unacceptable risk: AI systems considered a clear threat to the fundamental rights of people will be banned. This includes AI systems or applications that manipulate human behaviour to circumvent users’ free will, such as toys using voice assistance encouraging dangerous behaviour of minors, systems that allow ‘social scoring’ by governments or companies, and certain applications of predictive policing.

The European Commission

The law stipulates that by August 2, 2025, Member States must designate a body within the national system that will oversee compliance with this legislation.

This will be the AI Office at the EU level, as well as three advisory bodies: the European Artificial Intelligence Board, a board of independent experts that can signal risks that it has noticed, and an advisory forum that will include a wide range of stakeholders.

Companies that ignore the law’s requirements can face fines of up to 7% of their global annual turnover, and those that submit inaccurate information can face fines of up to 1.5%.

AIThe law will apply most of its rules from August 2, 2026, and in six months, it will ban AI systems deemed unacceptably risky. We will apply the rules to so-called general-purpose AI models in 12 months.

The European Parliament passed the law on AI in March 2024.

In July 2024, the regulatory authorities of the United States, the European Union, and the United Kingdom signed a joint statement on ensuring effective competition in the field of artificial intelligence (AI), which sets out the principles of consumer protection.

Ihor Petrenko

I'm a passionate journalist based in Ukraine, specialising in covering local news and events from Ukraine for the Western audience. Also, I work as a fixer for foreign media. Whether I write an article, report from the conflict zone or conduct interviews with political leaders and experts, I'm focused on delivering informative, engaging, and thought-generating content.

Recent Posts

How Propaganda and Cash Bonuses Feed Russia’s War Machine Despite High Losses

Russia’s war in Ukraine increasingly runs on a blunt exchange: money up front, myth on…

1 day ago

“You Don’t Need to Pay Influencers in Serbia”: Fact-Checker Ivan Subotić on How Russian Propaganda Thrives for Free

Ivan Subotić is the editor-in-chief at the Serbian portal FakeNews Tracker and collaborates with the…

2 days ago

Two Norwegian Sites, One Kremlin Script: Derimot.no and Steigan.no Under the Microscope

Pro-Russian propaganda in Norway rarely looks like a bot swarm or a shadowy “state channel”.…

6 days ago

Pro-Kremlin outlets weaponize Russia’s Oreshnik strike on Ukraine to intimidate Europe, justify aggression

A coordinated propaganda campaign across Central and Western Europe portrays Russia's Oreshnik missile strike on…

1 week ago

How a Russian Fake Nearly Reignited Ukrainian–Hungarian Tensions, and Why Pro-Orbán Media Took the Bait

In recent years, Viktor Orbán has earned a reputation as the most openly anti-Ukrainian leader…

1 week ago

Russian “Z-Nuns” in Sweden: How Churches Became a Channel for Espionage and War Financing

What began as a seemingly harmless act of charity in Swedish churches has turned into…

1 week ago