USA

Trump claims he is “for a just peace” for Ukraine but didn’t say how he plans to achieve it

US presidential candidate Donald Trump said he favors a “just” peace for Ukraine but refrained from being specific about what kind of agreement to end the war between Russia and Ukraine he would consider fair.

He said this in a conversation with the media after a meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in New York at Trump Tower, CNN reported.

Asked what he would consider a “fair” agreement to end the Russian-Ukrainian war, Trump replied, “It’s too early to talk about that.” “I have my ideas, and the president (Zelenskyy—Ed.) definitely has his own ideas. But it (peace—Ed.) must be fair,” Donald Trump said.

Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who was standing next to him, interjected his remark that this war should never have started in the first place.

“Putin has killed so many people. And of course, we must do everything to put pressure on him to end the war. He is on our territory—this is the most important thing to understand—he is on our territory,” the Ukrainian president emphasized.

Before the talks, Trump praised Zelenskyy’s handling of the attempted impeachment by Democrats in Congress and said they had a “great relationship.” However, he immediately said the same about his relationship with Russia’s ruler and reiterated his confidence that he could quickly stop the war. 

Trump explained how he would achieve a war settlement. He said he has a “very good relationship” with Volodymyr Zelenskyy and a “very good relationship” with President Putin, and he expressed hope that “we will get some kind of resolution quickly.”

In response to Trump’s remark about relations with Putin, Zelenskyy said, “I hope we have a better relationship,” to which Trump replied, “It takes two to tango.”

Zelenskyy and Trump met at Trump Tower in New York a day after a sharp escalation in which Trumpists accused the Ukrainian president of “interfering in the election” and aiding Biden by criticizing Trump’s “peace plan.”

House Speaker Mike Johnson refused to meet with Zelenskyy. Trump agreed to meet Zelenskyy at the last minute, turning it down initially.

On Wednesday, Speaker of the House Mike Johnson released a letter to President Zelenskyy with ultimatum demands for Ukraine.
Johnson posted a photocopy of the letter to the speaker’s official website and X account.

The document, dated September 25, is written in an ultimatum tone, which is unusual for intergovernmental correspondence.

“Dear President Zelenskyy, I demand that you immediately dismiss Ukraine’s Ambassador to the United States, Oksana Markarova,” the document begins.

Johnson cited an incident during the Ukrainian president’s visit to the United States—a visit to a Pennsylvania shell factory—as the motive for his ultimatum.

“Ambassador Markarova organized an event in which you visited a U.S. production facility in a key state, headed by a leading Kamala Harris associate. The event was devoid of any Republican presence due to the deliberate exclusion of all Republicans from invitations. This trip was obviously a partisan event designed to help Democrats, and it was definitely an interference (by the Ukrainian side) in the election process,” Mike Johnson said in his letter.

The speaker emphasized that now “Republicans have lost confidence in Ambassador Markarova’s ability to perform diplomatic functions in the United States honestly and effectively” and reiterated the demand to Zelenskyy that the Ukrainian ambassador “should be immediately dismissed from her post.”

Republicans in the US Congress have initiated an investigation into any coordination between Joe Biden’s administration and President Volodymyr Zelenskyy after his interview with critical remarks about presidential candidate Donald Trump.

The committee launched the investigation to determine whether the Biden-Harris administration tried to use Zelenskyy to help Vice President Harris’s presidential campaign, and if so, whether there was an abuse of office.

Mike

Media analyst and journalist. Fully committed to insightful, analytical, investigative journalism and debunking disinformation. My goal is to produce analytical articles on Ukraine, and Europe, based on trustworthy sources.

Recent Posts

Putin’s ‘election guarantee’ becomes weapon: how Pro-Russian media in Europe amplify Kremlin’s war narrative

By portraying Vladimir Putin as the only actor able to “ensure security” and “restore legitimacy”…

4 days ago

Lithuania Fights for Freedom of Speech: Society Defends Public Broadcaster LRT

Freedom of speech in Lithuania has become the centre of an unprecedented civic mobilisation, as…

5 days ago

Where Did Nearly One Million Russian Soldiers Go? A Chilling Manpower Puzzle

The question sounds almost abstract at first, like a numbers game. But it is not.…

1 week ago

Pro-Kremlin media coordinate lies about Ukraine’s Kupiansk loss to mask Moscow’s failure

European outlets synchronized a three-stage disinformation campaign that turned Russia's military defeat in Kupiansk into…

1 week ago

Putin Threatens Europe With War Over Kaliningrad: What Is Behind the Escalation?

Russian leader Vladimir Putin has once again raised the spectre of a large-scale war in…

1 week ago

The Kremlin’s Echo in Austria: How Russia-Friendly Outlets Repackage Moscow Propaganda for Local Audiences

Across Europe, Russia’s information strategy has evolved from centralized messaging to local translation—re-tailored for national…

2 weeks ago