Netherlands

Dutch Parliament recognizes Russia as a state sponsor of terrorism

On November 24, the Dutch Parliament declared that Russia was a state sponsor of terrorism and that its activities in Ukraine constituted terrorism. Deputies fully endorsed the Dutch government’s support for Ukraine.

Most parties supported the proposal of MP Tom van der Lee. They also supported the government’s policy of maximum possible support for Ukraine in the humanitarian, diplomatic and military areas.

Which Dutch parties supported the resolution

The vast majority of parties, in particular: VVD (People’s Party for Freedom and Democracy), D66 (Progressive Democrats), PvdA (Labour Party), and CDA (Christian Democratic Party), supported the proposal of MP Tom van der Lee from GroenLinks (Green Left).

The Netherlands will transfer 100 million euros to the newly created International Fund of support to Ukraine. The money will be used to support the Armed Forces of Ukraine, the Ministry of Defense of the Netherlands reported.

They will finance the purchase of military equipment for the Ukrainian army.

The world gradually recognizes Russia as a terrorist country

On November 23, the European Parliament adopted a resolution recognizing Russia as a sponsor of terrorism and a state that uses the means of terrorism. The document was supported by the absolute majority of MEPs during the voting.

On October 26, the Senate of Poland supported the resolution. Poland strongly condemned the Russian aggression and called on all countries that stand for peace, democracy, and human rights to recognize the Russian government as a terrorist regime.

In August, the Latvian Saeima recognized Russia as a state sponsor of terrorism. On October 18 Estonia declared Russia a state sponsor of terrorism. For this decision 88 deputies of the Estonian parliament.

In addition, on October 13, PACE recognized the Russian regime as a terrorist. The resolution was adopted unanimously. Russia is also recognized as a country sponsoring terrorism in Lithuania.

Mike

Media analyst and journalist. Fully committed to insightful, analytical, investigative journalism and debunking disinformation. My goal is to produce analytical articles on Ukraine, and Europe, based on trustworthy sources.

Recent Posts

How Propaganda and Cash Bonuses Feed Russia’s War Machine Despite High Losses

Russia’s war in Ukraine increasingly runs on a blunt exchange: money up front, myth on…

4 days ago

“You Don’t Need to Pay Influencers in Serbia”: Fact-Checker Ivan Subotić on How Russian Propaganda Thrives for Free

Ivan Subotić is the editor-in-chief at the Serbian portal FakeNews Tracker and collaborates with the…

4 days ago

Two Norwegian Sites, One Kremlin Script: Derimot.no and Steigan.no Under the Microscope

Pro-Russian propaganda in Norway rarely looks like a bot swarm or a shadowy “state channel”.…

1 week ago

Pro-Kremlin outlets weaponize Russia’s Oreshnik strike on Ukraine to intimidate Europe, justify aggression

A coordinated propaganda campaign across Central and Western Europe portrays Russia's Oreshnik missile strike on…

1 week ago

How a Russian Fake Nearly Reignited Ukrainian–Hungarian Tensions, and Why Pro-Orbán Media Took the Bait

In recent years, Viktor Orbán has earned a reputation as the most openly anti-Ukrainian leader…

2 weeks ago

Russian “Z-Nuns” in Sweden: How Churches Became a Channel for Espionage and War Financing

What began as a seemingly harmless act of charity in Swedish churches has turned into…

2 weeks ago